1. Academic Validation
  2. Mechanisms of in vivo binding site selection of the hematopoietic master transcription factor PU.1

Mechanisms of in vivo binding site selection of the hematopoietic master transcription factor PU.1

  • Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(13):6391-402. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt355.
Thu-Hang Pham 1 Julia Minderjahn Christian Schmidl Helen Hoffmeister Sandra Schmidhofer Wei Chen Gernot Längst Christopher Benner Michael Rehli
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Regensburg, F.-J.-Strauss Allee 11, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany.
Abstract

The transcription factor PU.1 is crucial for the development of many hematopoietic lineages and its binding patterns significantly change during differentiation processes. However, the 'rules' for binding or not-binding of potential binding sites are only partially understood. To unveil basic characteristics of PU.1 binding site selection in different cell types, we studied the binding properties of PU.1 during human macrophage differentiation. Using in vivo and in vitro binding assays, as well as computational prediction, we show that PU.1 selects its binding sites primarily based on sequence affinity, which results in the frequent autonomous binding of high affinity sites in DNase I inaccessible regions (25-45% of all occupied sites). Increasing PU.1 concentrations and the availability of cooperative transcription factor interactions during lineage differentiation both decrease affinity thresholds for in vivo binding and fine-tune cell type-specific PU.1 binding, which seems to be largely independent of DNA methylation. Occupied sites were predominantly detected in active chromatin domains, which are characterized by higher densities of PU.1 recognition sites and neighboring motifs for cooperative transcription factors. Our study supports a model of PU.1 binding control that involves motif-binding affinity, PU.1 concentration, cooperativeness with neighboring transcription factor sites and chromatin domain accessibility, which likely applies to all PU.1 expressing cells.

Figures