1. Academic Validation
  2. Lomofungin and dilomofungin: inhibitors of MBNL1-CUG RNA binding with distinct cellular effects

Lomofungin and dilomofungin: inhibitors of MBNL1-CUG RNA binding with distinct cellular effects

  • Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jun;42(10):6591-602. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku275.
Jason W Hoskins 1 Leslie O Ofori 2 Catherine Z Chen 3 Amit Kumar 4 Krzysztof Sobczak 1 Masayuki Nakamori 1 Noel Southall 3 Samarjit Patnaik 3 Juan J Marugan 3 Wei Zheng 3 Christopher P Austin 3 Matthew D Disney 4 Benjamin L Miller 5 Charles A Thornton 6
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
  • 2 Department of Chemistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
  • 3 Department of Chemistry, Scripps Florida, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
  • 4 Department of Dermatology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
  • 5 Division of Pre-clinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
  • 6 Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA Charles_thornton@urmc.rochester.edu.
Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a dominantly inherited neuromuscular disorder resulting from expression of RNA containing an expanded CUG repeat (CUG(exp)). The pathogenic RNA is retained in nuclear foci. Poly-(CUG) binding proteins in the Muscleblind-like (MBNL) family are sequestered in foci, causing misregulated alternative splicing of specific pre-mRNAs. Inhibitors of MBNL1-CUG(exp) binding have been shown to restore splicing regulation and correct phenotypes in DM1 models. We therefore conducted a high-throughput screen to identify novel inhibitors of MBNL1-(CUG)12 binding. The most active compound was lomofungin, a natural antimicrobial agent. We found that lomofungin undergoes spontaneous dimerization in DMSO, producing dilomofungin, whose inhibition of MBNL1-(CUG)12 binding was 17-fold more potent than lomofungin itself. However, while dilomofungin displayed the desired binding characteristics in vitro, when applied to cells it produced a large increase of CUG(exp) RNA in nuclear foci, owing to reduced turnover of the CUG(exp) transcript. By comparison, the monomer did not induce CUG(exp) accumulation in cells and was more effective at rescuing a CUG(exp)-induced splicing defect. These results support the feasibility of high-throughput screens to identify compounds targeting toxic RNA, but also demonstrate that ligands for repetitive sequences may have unexpected effects on RNA decay.

Figures
Products