1. Academic Validation
  2. Evaluation of the Effect of Contezolid (MRX-I) on the Corrected QT Interval in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Evaluation of the Effect of Contezolid (MRX-I) on the Corrected QT Interval in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

  • Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 May 21;64(6):e02158-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02158-19.
Junzhen Wu  # 1 2 3 Guoying Cao  # 2 3 4 Hailan Wu 1 2 3 Yuancheng Chen 2 3 4 Beining Guo 1 2 3 Xiaojie Wu 2 3 4 Jicheng Yu 2 3 4 Kanhong Ni 5 Jin Qian 5 Li Wang 5 Jufang Wu 1 2 3 4 Yu Wang 1 2 3 Hong Yuan 1 6 Jing Zhang 7 2 3 4 Yuewen Xi 8
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • 2 Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Shanghai, China.
  • 3 National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • 4 Phase I Unit, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • 5 Department of Cardiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • 6 MicuRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hayward, California, USA.
  • 7 Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China zhangj_fudan@aliyun.com xiyuewen@medmail.com.cn.
  • 8 Department of Cardiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China zhangj_fudan@aliyun.com xiyuewen@medmail.com.cn.
  • # Contributed equally.
Abstract

Contezolid (MRX-I), a new Oxazolidinone, is an Antibiotic in development for treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria. This was a thorough QT study conducted in 52 healthy subjects who were administered oral contezolid at a therapeutic (800 mg) dose, a supratherapeutic (1,600 mg) dose, placebo, and oral moxifloxacin at 400 mg in four separate treatment periods. The pharmacokinetic profile of contezolid was also evaluated. Time point analysis indicated that the upper bounds of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for placebo-corrected change-from-baseline QTc (ΔΔQTc) were <10 ms for the contezolid therapeutic dose at each time point. The upper bound of the 90% CI for ΔΔQTc was slightly more than 10 ms with the contezolid supratherapeutic dose at 3 and 4 h postdose, and the prolongation effect on the QT/QTc interval was less than that of the positive control, moxifloxacin, at 400 mg. At 3 and 4 h after the moxifloxacin dose, the moxifloxacin group met the assay sensitivity criteria outlined in ICH Guidance E14 by having a lower confidence bound of ≥5 ms. The results of a linear exposure-response model which were similar to that of a time point analysis demonstrated a slightly positive relationship between contezolid plasma levels and ΔQTcF interval with a slope of 0.227 ms per mg/liter (90% CI, 0.188 to 0.266). In summary, contezolid did not prolong the QT interval at a therapeutic dose and may have a slight effect on QT interval prolongation at a supratherapeutic dose.

Keywords

MRX-I; PK/PD model; TQT; concentration-response model; contezolid; thorough QT.

Figures
Products