1. Academic Validation
  2. Cefepime in vivo activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales that test as cefepime susceptible or susceptible-dose dependent in vitro: implications for clinical microbiology laboratory and clinicians

Cefepime in vivo activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales that test as cefepime susceptible or susceptible-dose dependent in vitro: implications for clinical microbiology laboratory and clinicians

  • J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 Jul 31;dkad229. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad229.
Aliaa Fouad 1 Christian M Gill 1 Patricia J Simner 2 David P Nicolau 1 3 Tomefa E Asempa 1
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development (CAIRD), Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
  • 2 Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • 3 Division of Infectious Diseases, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Abstract

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a public health concern. Among these isolates, there are reports of isolates that test as cefepime susceptible or susceptible-dose dependent (SDD) in vitro despite presence of a carbapenemase. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of cefepime against carbapenemase-producing (CP-CRE) and non-producing (non-CP-CRE) isolates with a range of cefepime MICs.

Methods: Reference broth microdilution and modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) were performed on genotypically characterized clinical CRE isolates. Ultimately, CP-CRE (n = 21; blaKPC) and non-CP-CRE (n = 19) isolates with a distribution of cefepime MICs (≤0.5 to >256 mg/L) were utilized in the murine thigh Infection model. Mice were treated with cefepime human-simulated regimens (HSRs) representative of a standard dose (1 g q12h 0.5 h infusion) or the SDD dose (2 g q8h 0.5 h infusion). Efficacy was assessed as the change in Bacterial growth at 24 h compared with 0 h control, where ≥1 log Bacterial reduction is considered translational value for clinical efficacy.

Results: Among both cohorts of CRE isolates, i.e. CP-CRE and non-CP-CRE, that tested as SDD to cefepime in vitro, 1 log Bacterial reduction was not attainable with cefepime. Further blunting of cefepime efficacy was observed among CP-CRE isolates compared with non-CP-CRE across both susceptible and SDD categories.

Conclusions: Data indicate to avoid cefepime for the treatment of serious infections caused by CRE isolates that test as cefepime susceptible or SDD. Data also provide evidence that isolates with the same Antibiotic MIC may have different pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles due to their antimicrobial resistance mechanism.

Figures
Products