1. Academic Validation
  2. Different mechanisms of action of beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists: a comparison of reproterol, fenoterol and salbutamol on monocyte cyclic-AMP and leukotriene B4 production in vitro

Different mechanisms of action of beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists: a comparison of reproterol, fenoterol and salbutamol on monocyte cyclic-AMP and leukotriene B4 production in vitro

  • Eur J Med Res. 2004 Jul 30;9(7):365-70.
Uwe R Juergens 1 M Stöber H Libertus W Darlath A Gillissen H Vetter
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Department of Pneumology, Allergology and Sleep Medicine, Medical Outpatient Clinic, Bonn University Hospital, Germany. uwejuergens@t-online.de
PMID: 15337638
Abstract

Background: Beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists have several effects on airway function, most of which are mediated in a variety of cell types resulting in increased c-AMP-production and inhibition of inflammatory mediator production. However, their stimulating effects on cAMP-production became known to be inversed by increasing phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity and degradation of cAMP. Therefore, in this study we have evaluated the efficacy of reproterol, a dual acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist and PDE-inhibitor, as compared to salbutamol and fenoterol with respect to production of cAMP and LTB4 in cultured monocytes.

Methods: Isolated human monocytes (10(5)/ml) were incubated (n = 9) in suspension with beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (10(-10) -10(-4) M) for 30 minutes with and without IBMX. Then, cAMP production was determined following treatment with Triton-X100. Production of LTB4 was measured following incubation of beta2-adrenoceptor agonists for 4 hrs in the presence of LPS (10 mg/ml). cAMP and LTB subset 4 were measured in culture supernatants by Enzyme immunoassay.

Results: At 10(-5) M, production of cAMP was significantly stimulated by reproterol > fenoterol > salbutamol in a dose-dependent manner to an extent of *128%, *65%, 13% (*p<0.04) respectively. In contrast, LTB4-production was inhibited significantly to a similar degree by salbutamol and reproterol in a dose-dependent manner by 59% and 49% (10(-5) M, p<0.03), respectively, with decreasing inhibition (15%) after fenoterol. Following co-incubation with IBMX, cAMP production only increased significantly (p<0.002) after fenoterol (+110%) compared to salbutamol (+29%) and reproterol (+50%) (ANOVA, p<0.001).

Conclusion: These data suggest effects of the theophylline constituent of reproterol to inhibit adenylyl cyclase induced phosphodiesterase activity. The advantageous synergistic effects of reproterol on cAMP-production need to be further explored in trials.

Figures
Products