2. Academic Validation
  3. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate

Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate

  • Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):247-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004.
Andrew S Levey 1,  Josef Coresh,  Tom Greene,  Lesley A Stevens,  Yaping Lucy Zhang,  Stephen Hendriksen,  John W Kusek,  Frederick Van Lente,  Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
PMID: 16908915 DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004
Abstract

Background: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates facilitate detection of chronic kidney disease but require calibration of the serum creatinine assay to the laboratory that developed the equation. The 4-variable equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study has been reexpressed for use with a standardized assay.

Objective: To describe the performance of the revised 4-variable MDRD Study equation and compare it with the performance of the 6-variable MDRD Study and Cockcroft-Gault equations.

Design: Comparison of estimated and measured GFR.

Setting: 15 clinical centers participating in a randomized, controlled trial.

Patients: 1628 patients with chronic kidney disease participating in the MDRD Study.

Measurements: Serum creatinine levels were calibrated to an assay traceable to isotope-dilution mass spectrometry. Glomerular filtration rate was measured as urinary clearance of 125I-iothalamate.

Results: Mean measured GFR was 39.8 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (SD, 21.2). Accuracy and precision of the revised 4-variable equation were similar to those of the original 6-variable equation and better than in the Cockcroft-Gault equation, even when the latter was corrected for bias, with 90%, 91%, 60%, and 83% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR, respectively. Differences between measured and estimated GFR were greater for all equations when the estimated GFR was 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or greater.

Limitations: The MDRD Study included few patients with a GFR greater than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Equations were not compared in a separate study sample.

Conclusions: The 4-variable MDRD Study equation provides reasonably accurate GFR estimates in patients with chronic kidney disease and a measured GFR of less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2. By using the reexpressed MDRD Study equation with the standardized serum creatinine assay, clinical laboratories can report more accurate GFR estimates.

Figures
Products