1. Academic Validation
  2. Evaluation of the use of chromogenic and fluorogenic substrates in solid-phase enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)

Evaluation of the use of chromogenic and fluorogenic substrates in solid-phase enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)

  • Biologicals. 1990 Oct;18(4):331-6. doi: 10.1016/1045-1056(90)90038-2.
J R Crowther 1 L Angarita J Anderson
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 A.F.R.C. Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, Surrey, U.K.
Abstract

Fluorogenic and chromogenic substrates were used in direct and trapping enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the detection of mouse IgG and foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). The detection limits for both antigens were compared using different combinations of Enzymes and substrates. Various times and concentrations of chemicals were used to obtain maximum sensitivity for both systems. Similar sensitivities were found using fluorogenic and chromogenic substrates. Tetramethyl benzidine substrate for horse-radish peroxidase Enzyme conjugates was found to attain the highest sensitivity levels for chromogenic assays (0.12 ng IgG/ml and 1.0 ng/ml FMDV respectively), after 10 min incubation. Of the two fluorogenic Enzyme/substrates studied, B-galactosidase was the most sensitive but required extended incubation times (2-3 h) as compared with chromogenic systems. Special microplates for fluoro-immunoassay (FIA) were compared with conventional microplates and no advantage was found to justify their use. An Alkaline Phosphatase anti-guinea-pig conjugate was used to confirm the equivalence of fluorogenic and chromogenic substrates in terms of sensitivity. A comparison of the amount of signal generated using various concentrations of Enzyme in the absence of antigen was made for two different Alkaline Phosphatase conjugates to obtain theoretical sensitivity limits. One possible advantage of fluorogenic substrates is that high binding ratio can improve the confidence in discrimination of positive results.

Figures
Products