1. Academic Validation
  2. Synthesis and muscarinic activity of a series of tertiary and quaternary N-substituted guvacine esters structurally related to arecoline and arecaidine propargyl ester

Synthesis and muscarinic activity of a series of tertiary and quaternary N-substituted guvacine esters structurally related to arecoline and arecaidine propargyl ester

  • Arzneimittelforschung. 1989 May;39(5):539-44. doi: 10.1002/chin.198944315.
M Wolf-Pflugmann 1 G Lambrecht J Wess E Mutschler
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Pharmacy and Food Chemistry, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Fed. Rep. of Germany.
Abstract

A series of tertiary and quaternary N-substituted guvacine (1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-3-carboxy-pyridine) methyl and propargyl esters have been synthesized and tested for muscarinic/antimuscarinic activity on rat ileum and electrically paced left atria. Arecoline and arecaidine propargyl ester (APE) as well as their corresponding N-demethyl derivatives, guvacoline (norarecoline) and guvacine propargyl ester, acted as full agonists at both atrial and ileal muscarinic receptors (range of pD2-values 6.09-8.07). However, in both preparations arecoline and APE were clearly more potent (up to 15-fold) than their N-demethyl analogues. Replacement of the N-methyl group in arecoline and APE by larger substituents (ethyl, n-propyl, n-butyl, benzyl, phenylethyl) as well as N-methylation resulted in a decrease or even a complete loss of agonistic activity. In both organs, the propargyl esters usually showed higher potency than the corresponding methyl ester analogues. N-Ethylguvacine propargyl ester and APE methiodide displayed pronounced agonistic activity in the atria (pD2 approximately 6.5; intrinsic activity = 0.79 and 0.67, respectively) but behaved as competitive antagonists in the ileum (pA2 = 6.06 and 5.62, respectively). Beside the lower sensitivity to muscarinic agonists of the rat ileum as compared to rat atria, the cardioselective stimulant action of both agents may also be due to their ability to recognize structural differences between atrial M2 alpha and ileal M2 beta muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Figures
Products