1. Academic Validation
  2. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-mutated cancers are sensitive to the green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-mutated cancers are sensitive to the green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate

  • Cancer Metab. 2019 May 20;7:4. doi: 10.1186/s40170-019-0198-7.
Tom H Peeters  # 1 Krissie Lenting  # 2 Vincent Breukels 1 Sanne A M van Lith 1 Corina N A M van den Heuvel 2 Remco Molenaar 3 Arno van Rooij 4 Ron Wevers 4 Paul N Span 5 Arend Heerschap 1 William P J Leenders 2
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 Nijmegen, HB The Netherlands.
  • 2 2Department of Biochemistry, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Geert Grooteplein 26, 6525 Nijmegen, GA The Netherlands.
  • 3 3Department of Medical Biology, Cancer Center Amsterdam at the Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 Amsterdam, AZ The Netherlands.
  • 4 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 Nijmegen, HB The Netherlands.
  • 5 5Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy and OncoImmunology Laboratory, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 Nijmegen, HB The Netherlands.
  • # Contributed equally.
Abstract

Background: Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) occur in various types of Cancer and induce metabolic alterations resulting from the neomorphic activity that causes production of D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) at the expense of α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) and NADPH. To overcome metabolic stress induced by these alterations, IDH-mutated (IDH mut ) cancers utilize rescue mechanisms comprising pathways in which Glutaminase and glutamate dehydrogenase (GLUD) are involved. We hypothesized that inhibition of glutamate processing with the pleiotropic GLUD-inhibitor epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) would not only hamper D-2-HG production, but also decrease NAD(P)H and α-KG synthesis in IDH mut cancers, resulting in increased metabolic stress and increased sensitivity to radiotherapy.

Methods: We performed 13C-tracing studies to show that HCT116 colorectal Cancer cells with an IDH1 R132H knock-in allele depend more on glutaminolysis than on glycolysis for the production of D-2-HG. We treated HCT116 cells, HCT116-IDH1 R132H cells, and HT1080 cells (carrying an IDH1 R132C mutation) with EGCG and evaluated D-2-HG production, cell proliferation rates, and sensitivity to radiotherapy.

Results: Significant amounts of 13C from glutamate accumulate in D-2-HG in HCT116-IDH1 wt/R132H but not in HCT116-IDH1 wt/wt . Preventing glutamate processing in HCT116-IDH1 wt/R132H cells with EGCG resulted in reduction of D-2-HG production. In addition, EGCG treatment decreased proliferation rates of IDH1 mut cells and at high doses sensitized Cancer cells to ionizing radiation. Effects of EGCG in IDH-mutated cell lines were diminished by treatment with the IDH1mut inhibitor AGI-5198.

Conclusions: This work shows that glutamate can be directly processed into D-2-HG and that reduction of glutamatolysis may be an effective and promising new treatment option for IDH mut cancers.

Keywords

EGCG; Glutamate; IDH mutations; Metabolism; Radiotherapy.

Figures