1. Academic Validation
  2. Effects of uninterrupted sinusoidal LF-EMF stimulation on LTP induced by different combinations of TBS/HFS at the Schaffer collateral-CA1 of synapses

Effects of uninterrupted sinusoidal LF-EMF stimulation on LTP induced by different combinations of TBS/HFS at the Schaffer collateral-CA1 of synapses

  • Brain Res. 2019 Dec 15;1725:146487. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146487.
Yu Zheng 1 Xiao-Xu Ma 2 Lei Dong 3 Wei Ma 2 Jian-Hao Cheng 2
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China. Electronic address: zhengyu@tjpu.edu.cn.
  • 2 School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China.
  • 3 State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Abstract

Long-term potentiation (LTP) is an important aspect of synaptic plasticity and is one of the main mechanisms involved in memory. Low-frequency electromagnetic fields (LF-EMFs) such as transcranial magnetic stimulation are emerging neuromodulation tools for the regulation of LTP. However, whether LF-EMFs have different effects on different types of LTP has not yet been verified. Herein, we studied the regulatory effects of 15 Hz/2 mT sinusoidal magnetic field as pre-magnetic stimulation on several types of LTP, which were induced by theta-burst(TBS) or high-frequency stimulation (HFS) or some combination of them, and applied N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor(NMDAR) antagonists to observe the relationship between the regulation of LTP by LF-EMFs and NMDAR in the Schaffer collateral pathway of rat brain slices in vitro. The results presented in this paper are the performance of TBS and HFS was not exactly the same and the recovery speed of TBS-LTP was faster than HFS-LTP after receiving the regulation of LF-EMFs; moreover, the LTP level was affected by the order of combination and the effect of pre-magnetic stimulation could maintain the entire process of the combined induction experiment, while NMDAR antagonists could not completely offset the influence of LF-EMFs. The memory patterns are diverse, and this study has shown LF-EMFs can regulate LTP such as TBS-LTP and HFS-LTP and can continuously affect multiple LTP induction processes. However, different memory processes may have different performance in the face of LF-EMFs regulation. In terms of the mechanism of LF-EMFs-induced LTP regulation, NMDARs may be involved in the process of LF-EMF regulation of LTP, but are not the only factor.

Keywords

HFS; Long-term potentiation (LTP); Low frequency electromagnetic field (LF-EMF); Synaptic plasticity; TBS.

Figures
Products