1. Academic Validation
  2. Molecular interactions of full-length and truncated GIP peptides with the GIP receptor - A comprehensive review

Molecular interactions of full-length and truncated GIP peptides with the GIP receptor - A comprehensive review

  • Peptides. 2020 Mar;125:170224. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2019.170224.
Maria Buur Nordskov Gabe 1 Wijnand J C van der Velden 1 Florent Xavier Smit 1 Lærke Smidt Gasbjerg 2 Mette Marie Rosenkilde 3
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Clinical Metabolic Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
  • 3 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: rosenkilde@sund.ku.dk.
Abstract

Enzymatic cleavage of endogenous Peptides is a commonly used principle to initiate, modulate and terminate action for instance among cytokines and peptide Hormones. The incretin Hormones, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and the related hormone glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) are all rapidly N-terminally truncated with severe loss of intrinsic activity. The most abundant circulating form of full length GIP(1-42) is GIP(3-42) (a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) product). GIP(1-30)NH2 is another active form resulting from prohormone convertase 2 (PC2) cleavage of proGIP. Like GIP(1-42), GIP(1-30)NH2 is a substrate for DPP-4 generating GIP(3-30)NH2 which, compared to GIP(3-42), binds with higher affinity and very efficiently inhibits GIP receptor (GIPR) activity with no intrinsic activity. Here, we review the action of these four and multiple Other N- and C-terminally truncated forms of GIP with an emphasis on molecular pharmacology, i.e. ligand binding, subsequent receptor activation and desensitization. Our overall conclusion is that the N-terminus is essential for receptor activation as GIP N-terminal truncation leads to decreased/lost intrinsic activity and antagonism (similar to GLP-1 and GLP-2), whereas the C-terminal extension of GIP(1-42), as compared to GLP-1, GLP-2 and glucagon (29-33 Amino acids), has no apparent impact on the GIPR in vitro, but may play a role for Other properties such as stability and tissue distribution. A deeper understanding of the molecular interaction of naturally occurring and designed GIP-based Peptides, and their impact in vivo, may contribute to a future therapeutic targeting of the GIP system - either with agonists or with antagonists, or both.

Keywords

Agonists; Antagonists; GIP receptor; GIP(1-42).

Figures
Products