1. Academic Validation
  2. In vitro synergistic activity of aztreonam (AZT) plus novel and old β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against metallo-β-lactamase-producing AZT-resistant Enterobacterales

In vitro synergistic activity of aztreonam (AZT) plus novel and old β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against metallo-β-lactamase-producing AZT-resistant Enterobacterales

  • J Med Microbiol. 2021 Oct;70(10). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001427.
Ivan Cervino 1 Deborah Gonzalez 1 Marcela Nastro 1 Juana Vega 1 Ana Paula Reyes 1 Gisella Buriano 1 Carlos Vay 1 Angela Famiglietti 1 Carlos Hernan Rodriguez 1
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Laboratorio de Bacteriología, Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica - INFIBIOC, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Avenida Córdoba 2351, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract

The emergence of Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, mainly New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), represents a clinical threat due to the limited therapeutic alternatives. Aztreonam (AZT) is stable to MBLs, but most MBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates usually co-harbour other β-lactamases that confer resistance to AZT and, consequently, its use is restricted in these isolates. We compared the ability of sulbactam (SUL), tazobactam (TAZ), clavulanic acid (CLA) and avibactam (AVI) to restore the AZT activity in MBL-producing AZT-resistant Enterobacterales isolates. A collection of 64 NDM-producing AZT-resistant Enterobacterales from five hospitals in Buenos Aires city, Argentina, were studied during the period July-December 2020. MICs were determined using the agar dilution method with Mueller-Hinton agar according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations. AVI, SUL and TAZ were used at a fixed concentration of 4 mg l-1, whereas CLA was used at a fixed concentration of 2 mg l-1. A screening method based on disc diffusion to evaluate this synergy was also conducted. Detection of bla KPC, bla OXA, bla NDM, bla VIM, bla CTXM-1, bla PER-2 and bla CIT was performed by PCR. The AZT-AVI combination restored the AZT activity in 98.4 % of AZT-resistant strains, whereas CLA, TAZ and SUL did so in 70.3, 15.6 and 12.5 %, respectively, in isolates co-harbouring extended-spectrum β-lactamases, but were inactive in isolates harbouring AmpC-type Enzymes and/or KPC. The synergy screening test showed an excellent negative predictive value to confirm the absence of synergy, but positive results should be confirmed by a quantitative method. The excellent in vitro performance of the AZT-CLA combination represents a much more economical alternative to AZT-AVI, which could be of use in the treatment of MBL-producing, AZT-resistant Enterobacterales.

Keywords

NDM; avibactam-aztreonam; clavulanic acid-aztreonam; monobactam; sulbactam; tazobactam.

Figures
Products