1. Academic Validation
  2. Comparative Pharmacology of a Bis-Pivaloyloxymethyl Phosphonate Prodrug Inhibitor of Enolase after Oral and Parenteral Administration

Comparative Pharmacology of a Bis-Pivaloyloxymethyl Phosphonate Prodrug Inhibitor of Enolase after Oral and Parenteral Administration

  • ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2023 Jan 6;6(2):245-252. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.2c00216.
Victoria C Yan 1 Yasaman Barekatain 2 Yu-Hsi Lin 1 Nikunj Satani 1 Naima Hammoudi 1 Kenisha Arthur 1 Dimitra K Georgiou 1 Yongying Jiang 3 Yuting Sun 3 Joseph R Marszalek 4 Steven W Millward 1 Florian L Muller 1
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-4000, United States.
  • 2 Department of Cancer Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-4000, United States.
  • 3 Institute of Applied Cancer Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-4000, United States.
  • 4 Center for Co-Clinical Trials, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-4000, United States.
Abstract

Metabolically labile prodrugs can experience stark differences in catabolism incurred by the chosen route of administration. This is especially true for phosph(on)ate prodrugs, in which successive promoiety removal transforms a lipophilic molecule into increasingly polar compounds. We previously described a phosphonate inhibitor of Enolase (HEX) and its bis-pivaloyloxymethyl ester prodrug (POMHEX) capable of eliciting strong tumor regression in a murine model of Enolase 1 (ENO1)-deleted glioblastoma following parenteral administration. Here, we characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these Enolase inhibitors in vitro and in vivo after oral and parenteral administration. In support of the historical function of lipophilic prodrugs, the bis-POM prodrug significantly improves cell permeability of and rapid hydrolysis to the parent phosphonate, resulting in rapid intracellular loading of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro and in vivo. We observe the influence of intracellular trapping in vivo on divergent pharmacokinetic profiles of POMHEX and its metabolites after oral and parenteral administration. This is a clear demonstration of the tissue reservoir effect hypothesized to explain phosph(on)ate prodrug pharmacokinetics but has heretofore not been explicitly demonstrated.

Figures
Products