1. Academic Validation
  2. Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Mutations at Positions L50, E166, and L167 Rendering Resistance to Covalent and Noncovalent Inhibitors

Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Mutations at Positions L50, E166, and L167 Rendering Resistance to Covalent and Noncovalent Inhibitors

  • J Med Chem. 2024 Oct 24;67(20):18478-18490. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01781.
Andrey Kovalevsky 1 Annie Aniana 2 Rodolfo Ghirlando 3 Leighton Coates 4 Victoria N Drago 1 Lauren Wear 5 Oksana Gerlits 5 Nashaat T Nashed 2 John M Louis 2
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1 Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.
  • 2 Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0520, United States.
  • 3 Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0540, United States.
  • 4 Second Target Station, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1 Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.
  • 5 Department of Natural Sciences, Tennessee Wesleyan University, Athens, Tennessee 37303, United States.
Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 propagation under nirmatrelvir and ensitrelvir pressure selects for main Protease (MPro) drug-resistant mutations E166V (DRM2), L50F/E166V (DRM3), E166A/L167F (DRM4), and L50F/E166A/L167F (DRM5). DRM2-DRM5 undergoes N-terminal autoprocessing to produce mature MPro with dimer dissociation constants (Kdimer) 2-3 times larger than that of the wildtype. Co-selection of L50F restores catalytic activity of DRM2 and DRM4 from ∼10 to 30%, relative to that of the wild-type Enzyme, without altering Kdimer. Binding affinities and thermodynamic profiles that parallel the drug selection pressure, exhibiting significant decreases in affinity through entropy/enthalpy compensation, were compared with GC373. Reorganization of the active sites due to mutations observed in the inhibitor-free DRM3 and DRM4 structures as compared to MProWT may account for the reduced binding affinities, although DRM2 and DRM3 complexes with ensitrelvir are almost identical to MProWT-ensitrelvir. Chemical reactivity changes of the mutant active sites due to differences in electrostatic and protein dynamics effects likely contribute to losses in binding affinities.

Figures
Products