1. Academic Validation
  2. Bifunctional intercalation of antitumor antibiotics BBM-928A and echinomycin with deoxyribonucleic acid. Effects of intercalation on deoxyribonucleic acid degradative activity of bleomycin and phleomycin

Bifunctional intercalation of antitumor antibiotics BBM-928A and echinomycin with deoxyribonucleic acid. Effects of intercalation on deoxyribonucleic acid degradative activity of bleomycin and phleomycin

  • Biochemistry. 1982 Jul 20;21(15):3704-10. doi: 10.1021/bi00258a028.
C H Huang A W Prestayko S T Crooke
Abstract

The binding of peptide antitumor Antibiotics, BBM-928A and echinomycin, to superhelical PM2 DNA and the effects of the resulting conformational changes of DNA on the DNA-degradative activity of two related antitumor Antibiotics, bleomycin A2 and phleomycin D1, have been studied. The bifunctional intercalative mode of the DNA binding of BBM-928A concluded previously from viscometric and fluorometric studies has been confirmed by gel electrophoretic analysis. Under the employed electrophoretic conditions, DNA-bound BBM-928A showed little dissociation whereas echinomycin and ethidium bromide showed partial and nearly complete dissociation, respectively. BBM-928A induced neither single-strand nor double-strand breaks in DNA. Competitive binding studies by fluorescence changes suggested that binding sites on DNA molecules for BBM-928A (or echinomycin) may differ from those for ethidium bromide, since binding to DNA by the two drugs was not competitive even at saturating concentrations. The lack of such a competition between the two drugs is not consistent with the neighbor-exclusion principle. The DNA-degradative activity of both bleomycin A2 and phleomycin D1 increased with the removal of the negative superhelicity of DNA by the BBM-928A intercalation and decreased with the formation of positive superhelical turns induced by high concentrations of BBM-928A. Thus the degradative activity of both bleomycin A2 and phleomycin D1 is sensitive in a similar manner to the degree of superhelicity rather than the double helicity of DNA, although there are differences between these two drugs in interaction with DNA.

Figures
Products