1. Academic Validation
  2. Use of norethindrone acetate alone for postoperative suppression of endometriosis symptoms

Use of norethindrone acetate alone for postoperative suppression of endometriosis symptoms

  • J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012 Apr;25(2):105-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.09.013.
D J Kaser 1 S A Missmer 2 K F Berry 3 M R Laufer 4
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Division of Gynecology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • 2 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Medicine, Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • 3 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • 4 Division of Gynecology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: Marc.Laufer@childrens.harvard.edu.
Abstract

Study objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of norethindrone acetate (NA) as single-agent hormonal therapy for suppression of endometriosis symptoms in adolescents and young adults.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Two academic medical centers.

Participants: A keyword search using the query 'NA' was applied to the electronic medical records of all women treated by one gynecologist (M.R.L.) from 1992 to 2010. IRB-approved chart review was then conducted on the index records.

Interventions: Continuous treatment with NA (5-15 mg daily).

Main outcome measures: Postoperative bleeding and pain scores; adverse effects.

Results: One hundred and ninety-four patients with surgically diagnosed endometriosis initiated NA postoperatively during the study period. Median patient age was 18.9 years. 92.2% of patients had stage 1 or 2 disease, and distribution was similar among those excluded. Median pain scores decreased from 5 at NA initiation to 0 at follow-up (P = .0001) and bleeding scores from 2 to 0, respectively (P = .001) for all stages of endometriosis. Post-NA bleeding scores were improved regardless of prior hormonal regimen, and post-NA pain scores improved in all patients except for those previously prescribed GnRH-agonist plus add-back. Most patients (55.2%) did not report any side effects. The most common adverse effect was weight gain (16.1%), with a mean increase in BMI of 1.2 ± 1.6 kg/m(2) at 12 months.

Conclusion: NA alone is a well-tolerated, effective option to manage pain and bleeding for all stages of endometriosis. Among those on prior hormonal therapy, symptoms improved after NA initiation.

Figures