1. Academic Validation
  2. Withaferin A suppresses skin tumor promotion by inhibiting proteasome-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 degradation

Withaferin A suppresses skin tumor promotion by inhibiting proteasome-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 degradation

  • Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Oct;8(6):2449-2460. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.09.57.
Kaiyue Xu  # 1 Chunjing Zhang  # 2 Youbo Li 1 Xin Xi 3 Lishuang Zheng 3 Ming Meng 1 Tongtong Liu 4 Yunfeng Zhao 5 Wenjuan Li 1 6
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 College of Medicine, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China.
  • 2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161006, China.
  • 3 Hebei Key Laboratory of Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Baoding 071000, China.
  • 4 Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China.
  • 5 Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology & Neuroscience, LSU Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
  • 6 Key Laboratory of Pathogenesis Mechanism and Control of Inflammatory-autoimmune Diseases in Hebei Province, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China.
  • # Contributed equally.
Abstract

Background: The metabolic Enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) belonging to β-decarboxylase dehydrogenase family has been identified as a tumor suppressor. Withaferin A (WA), a bioactive compound derived from Withania somnifera, has the anti-tumor activity. Based on the data set that WA inhibited 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced IDH1 inactivation and mitochondrial dysfunction, we focused on how WA suppressed the skin carcinogenesis mediated by IDH1.

Methods: The mRNA levels of IDH1 were measured after treated with TPA and/or WA. The expression of IDH1, Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) involved in glycolysis, hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and its target gene glucose transporter-1 (GLUT1) were detected. The activities of Proteasome and the mitochondrial complex I related to mitochondrial functions were determined. The enzymatic activities of LDH, proline hydroxylase (PHD) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were analyzed.

Results: The qPCR data have shown the mRNA levels of IDH1 were no difference with TPA and/or WA treatment. Next, data demonstrated that WA could stabilize IDH1 by inhibiting the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP). Followed by illuminating the mechanism of IDH1 inhibiting tumorigenesis, the results mirrored that upregulated IDH1 suppressed LDH activity whereas increased mitochondrial complex I activity. Furthermore, via its product α-KG, upregulated IDH1 activated PHD, and inhibited HIF-1α and its downstream signaling pathway.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that WA inhibits tumor promotion partially via stabilizing IDH1, leading to inactivating the HIF-1α signaling.

Keywords

Withaferin A (WA); chemoprevention; isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1); skin carcinogenesis; ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP).

Figures
Products